San Jose Police Release Bodycam Video From George Floyd Riots
San Jose Police Department Press Release
Today we are releasing BWC (body-worn camera) footage of three incidents that we consider to be events of extraordinary public interest. We understand there is a heightened desire by the public to see BWC in cases that are widely circulated on-line and covered by media outlets.
We currently release BWC footage for incidents as required by state legislation. We have rarely released BWC in cases not required by legislation, where there is pending litigation or when there are ongoing investigations that could be impacted.
We understand we need to make some amount of BWC footage available to the public that goes beyond what is required; the three videos released today are the types of cases where we want to expand beyond what is required to be as transparent as possible. This is the first step towards that goal.
Statement from Chief Garcia:
“We hope releasing these videos will provide the public more clarity into each of these incidents. Each video is only one piece of information used to fully understand a complex event. Some opinions and conclusions may be affected after watching certain videos; others will not.”
What may have looked like a motorcycle officer intentionally hitting a person in cell phone video was, in fact, a traffic collision after a fleeing suspected ran in front of that motorcycle.
In another video, we see the offensive and completely unacceptable language used by an Officer that undermined the countless other officers navigating the same challenging circumstances but acting professionally.
Body-worn camera video is an essential component in investigations and in maintaining the public trust. The decision to release these videos today has been a collaboration with the City Manager and the Mayor. Coming up with a process of releasing videos of significant public interest is the right thing to do and we are eager to have that in place soon. Releasing these three videos is a positive step in that direction.”
The following videos include multiple camera angles and pre-arrest footage of 10 minutes except incident #1 as it was a rapidly unfolding event capturing only 1 minute 22 seconds prior to the collision.
Incident 1) Case number 20-152-0358 (Pedestrian versus Traffic Unit Motorcycle)
On Sunday, May 31st at approximately 9:30 PM, Officers were in the downtown area during large protests. Officers received a call of possible looting and an attempted commercial burglary at the Bank of America branch at South Fourth and San Fernando Streets.
Officers attempted to detain multiple suspects seen in the area of the bank who they believed were possibly armed with weapons or tools that were utilized to remove the plywood from the front of the bank. All indications were that the group was engaging in an attempted commercial burglary of the bank, a felony in California. One of the suspects fled from officers on foot, he ran in a zig-zag manner northbound on Fourth Street. The fleeing subject was wanted for suspected involvement in a felony commercial burglary.
He was on the sidewalk on the west side of the street. SJPD Traffic Unit Officers on motorcycles were simultaneously riding northbound parallel to the suspect. During the foot chase, a foam baton round was fired at and struck the suspect in his lower body.
The suspect then made a sudden sharp right turn into the street, with Officers still pursuing him, and ran into the lanes of traffic where the Motor Officers were traveling. He ran directly into the path of a motorcycle, the Officer attempted emergency braking but was not able to stop his motorcycle from colliding with the suspect.
The suspect was taken into custody after the collision. You can hear the suspect ask for medical attention on the video, County EMS medical was called to the scene but the suspect changed his mind and refused medical treatment.
Officers transported the suspect to the command center for processing.
The collision in this incident was found to be a traffic collision, and not a legal intervention or use of force. A traffic collision investigation was completed for the incident.
Following the incident, Officers inspected the damage to the bank. Protesters had removed sections of the boarded windows attempting to enter the bank.
Incident 2 Case Number 20-150-0495 (Subject attempting to disarm Officer/Failing to disperse)
On Friday, May 29th at approximately 3:00 PM, protests began to turn violent in the eastern part of the city, in particular the area of Highway 101 and Alum Rock Avenue. Protesters walked onto the freeway and temporarily halted traffic. As the afternoon went on protesters began to gather in the area of City Hall located on Santa Clara Street. The crowd numbered in the hundreds and possibly over 1,000.
Officers were mobilized from all over the city and responded to deal with the unrest. It should be noted that numerous objects were thrown at Officers in an assaultive manner; some of the objects were large rocks, frozen plastic water bottles, and glass bottles just to name a few. At approximately 5:00 pm a dispersal order was given and declared the gathering an unlawful assembly. The order was broadcast via a long-range acoustic device and was repeated for the duration of the event.
One group of officers formed a line by standing next to each other in an attempt to control the crowd. The subject depicted in this video can be seen from several different angles approaching the line of Officers, clearly not dispersing from the scene. He got close enough to the line that one Officer was forced to use an approved crowd control technique and pushed the subject back utilizing his wooden baton by holding it horizontal to the ground and pushing the subject away. A physical confrontation ensued and the subject subsequently attempted to disarm the Officer by pulling on his baton. Attempting to disarm an Officer is a misdemeanor crime per California penal code section 148(b). This image is clearly visible in a still frame from the Officer’s BWC. The subject then began to swing wildly at the Officer with his arms in a striking motion. Other Officers immediately ran over to assist and attempted to subdue the subject. The physical confrontation continued until the subject was wrestled to the ground and was eventually subdued and placed into handcuffs.
The subject sustained injuries as a result of the confrontation and was transported to a nearby hospital for treatment.
Incident 3 Case Number 20-150-0495 (Foam Baton deployment/Attempted arrest of a felon)
Related to incident #2, on the same date at approximately 5:45 PM, another team of Officers was dealing with a hostile crowd at San Jose City Hall. Members of the Special Operations Division were deployed alongside Patrol Officers. A suspect was identified that had thrown a bottle at an Officer; he is depicted in the video wearing a white T-shirt and a white mask covering his face.
Officers can be heard formulating a plan on how and when to arrest the suspect for the bottle-throwing, a crime classified as a felony and covered under California Penal Code Section 245(c). A foam baton round is fired at the subject prior to effecting the arrest; after being struck by the foam baton round the suspect immediately turns and flees on foot and is not apprehended. Because of his escape Officers were not able to evaluate or ascertain if the suspect received any injuries as a result of the foam baton strike.
This video depicts the Officer using offensive and unacceptable language during the protest.
NOTICE: All persons depicted are presumed to be innocent unless proven to be guilty in a court of law. The fugitive.com and fugitivewatch.com notations appearing on this are TRADEMARKS and NOT an expression of fact or opinion.
AVISO: Todas las personas representadas son presumidas de ser inocente a menos que resultara culpable en un tribunal de justicia. Fugitive.com y fugitivewatch.com anotaciones que aparecen en este sitio son MARCAS REGISTRADAS y NO una expresión de hecho o de opinión.
COMMENT ADVISEMENT: We welcome your thoughts, but for the sake of all readers, please refrain from the use of obscenities, personal attacks or racial slurs. All comments are subject to our terms of service and may be removed. Repeat offenders may lose commenting privileges.
AVISO DE COMENTARIO: Damos la bienvenida a tus pensamientos, pero por el bien de todos los lectores, por favor abstenerse de la utilización de obscenidades, ataques personales o insultos racistas. Todos los comentarios están sujetos a nuestros términos y condiciones del servicio, y podrá ser retirado. Reincidentes pueden perder privilegios comentar.
Fugitive Watch was founded in 1992 by two San Jose police officers, Steve Ferdin and Scott Castruita. Fugitive Watch is a reality-based television show, newspaper and website, fugitive.com. We can also be found on social media such as Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. The mission of Fugitive Watch is to make Your community safer by helping law enforcement fight crime. Fugitive Watch brings the community, local business, and law enforcement together to solve crimes, apprehend wanted fugitives and provide education and crime prevention information to the community.
Business and private sponsorship help Fugitive Watch empower the community to strike back at crime from the safety of their living rooms. Fugitive Watch has been credited by law enforcement with over several 1000 crimes solved or fugitives apprehended. Fugitive Watch also helps improve the safety of police officers by locating fugitives for law enforcement so they can more safely arrest them rather than unexpectedly running across them through extremely dangerous routine “chance encounters”. As law enforcement officers know all too well, These “chance encounters” have resulted in countless officer injuries and deaths.