Former Football Star Dana Stubblefield Found Guilty of Rape
Former San Francisco 49ers and Oakland Raiders player Dana Stubblefield has been found guilty of raping a woman while using a gun.
The verdict was read Monday afternoon in the sexual assault trial at the Hall of Justice in San Jose.
Stubblefield was declared guilty of rape by force, menace or fear and guilty of using a firearm in commission of the crime. He barely moved when he heard the verdicts. Now he faces 15 year to life in prison after being convicted in the April 9, 2015 incident.
“He took advantage of her, he preyed on her, he though because of her disability and the fact that they were alone that she wouldn’t report it and that she wouldn’t be able to testify in court, but the jury felt otherwise,” Santa Clara County Deputy District Attorney Tim McInery said.
The former NFL star had been charged for raping a disabled woman who went to his Morgan Hill house to be interviewed as a potential babysitter.
His attorneys previously called the charges “absolutely ridiculous” and said the accusations were motivated by money.
Stubblefield has encountered legal trouble in the past.
In 2010, a federal judge sentenced the former 49ers star to 90 days in jail for stealing his former girlfriend’s mail. Also that year, Stubblefield admitted to submitting a change of address form so his former girlfriend’s mail, including her unemployment checks, would be delivered to his residence.
Stubblefield was placed on probation in 2009 after pleading guilty to lying to investigators about his steroid use during his days on the field.
He played 11 seasons in the NFL, including the first five with the 49ers. Stubblefield later returned to the 49ers in 2001 and ’02 before finishing his career with the Oakland Raiders.
Stubblefield, a first-round pick of the 49ers’ in 1993, recorded 10.5 sacks and was named the NFL Defensive Rookie of the Year. He was named the NFL’s Defensive Player of the Year, with a career-high 15 sacks in 1997, and signed a lucrative contract with Washington in 1998.
NOTICE: All persons depicted are presumed to be innocent unless proven to be guilty in a court of law. The fugitive.com and fugitivewatch.com notations appearing on this are TRADEMARKS and NOT an expression of fact or opinion.
AVISO: Todas las personas representadas son presumidas de ser inocente a menos que resultara culpable en un tribunal de justicia. Fugitive.com y fugitivewatch.com anotaciones que aparecen en este sitio son MARCAS REGISTRADAS y NO una expresión de hecho o de opinión.
COMMENT ADVISEMENT: We welcome your thoughts, but for the sake of all readers, please refrain from the use of obscenities, personal attacks or racial slurs. All comments are subject to our terms of service and may be removed. Repeat offenders may lose commenting privileges.
AVISO DE COMENTARIO: Damos la bienvenida a tus pensamientos, pero por el bien de todos los lectores, por favor abstenerse de la utilización de obscenidades, ataques personales o insultos racistas. Todos los comentarios están sujetos a nuestros términos y condiciones del servicio, y podrá ser retirado. Reincidentes pueden perder privilegios comentar.
Fugitive Watch was founded in 1992 by two San Jose police officers, Steve Ferdin and Scott Castruita. Fugitive Watch is a reality-based television show, newspaper and website, fugitive.com. We can also be found on social media such as Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. The mission of Fugitive Watch is to make Your community safer by helping law enforcement fight crime. Fugitive Watch brings the community, local business, and law enforcement together to solve crimes, apprehend wanted fugitives and provide education and crime prevention information to the community.
Business and private sponsorship help Fugitive Watch empower the community to strike back at crime from the safety of their living rooms. Fugitive Watch has been credited by law enforcement with over several 1000 crimes solved or fugitives apprehended. Fugitive Watch also helps improve the safety of police officers by locating fugitives for law enforcement so they can more safely arrest them rather than unexpectedly running across them through extremely dangerous routine “chance encounters”. As law enforcement officers know all too well, These “chance encounters” have resulted in countless officer injuries and deaths.