Central States Violent Crime

Joseph Oberhansley Allegedly Kills and Eats Ex-Girlfriend

Joseph Oberhansley and Tammy Jo Blanton
Joseph Oberhansley Allegedly Kills and Eats Ex-Girlfriend Tammy Jo Blanton

Joseph Oberhansley Allegedly Kills and Eats Ex-Girlfriend

Did Joseph Oberhansley break into the home of his ex-girlfriend in 2014, before raping and murdering her?

That’s what a jury will decide in Clark County as the trial continues for the man accused of murdering Tammy Jo Blanton and eating parts of her body.

Infinite Appliance

Infinite Appliance in San Jose, CA

Fugitive Watch Patreon Ad

Click on this ad to become a Patron

For the first time in years, Oberhansley was brought into the courtroom not in a jail uniform and handcuffs but instead, a suit jacket.

Coming in, Oberhansley said once again that he didn’t kill Blanton.

“State prosecution knows I’m not guilty in this case that’s why they dropped the death penalty,” he said. “Two black male suspects broke into the house and killed Tammy.”

Clark County Prosecutor Jeremy Mull painted a grim picture for the jurors, telling them how Blanton had come to be very afraid of the man she’d been living with for a few months at her home in Jeffersonville. He told jurors that the weekend before the murder, Oberhansley held Blanton captive, raping her, eventually leading her to change her locks and kick him out of the house.

Oberhansley interjected during the prosecutor’s opening statements, at one point saying he objected, and another time contradicting the prosecutor about what he was telling the jury, saying “You don’t have any proof of that.”

Mull described to jurors how Oberhansley broke into Blanton’s home on Sept. 11, 2014, stabbing her 25 times. Some of those stab wounds were to her nose and mouth.

Nearly five years after Blanton’s death, and a number of delays in the case, Mull said he’s ready to get to work with the trial.

“The family has been so patient,” he said. “And it’s been something that has weighed on me every single day as the Clark County Prosecutor, the fact that this case was pending, untried, and this family hasn’t received justice yet.”

After Mull’s opening statements, it was the defense’s turn.

The opening statements on their side were much shorter. Instead, they asked the jury to look at the evidence presented from all sides and to keep an open mind, especially when hearing Oberhansley’s interview with police during the coming days of his trial.

Defense attorney Brent Westerfeld said Oberhansley is delusional, having a difficult time understanding the proceedings because of his mental illness. An insanity defense will not be used in the case, at Oberhansley’s insistence, but Westerfeld said his mental health needs to be weighed here.

“We believe his decision making was the result of his mental illness, and we believe that makes this process unfair,” Westerfield said. “You know, when a crazy person is deciding what his defense is, that’s a problem in our mind under the constitution.”

Judge Vicki Carmichael instructed jurors they’ll need to listen to the evidence over the coming days and decide if Oberhansley is guilty of burglary, rape and murder beyond a reasonable doubt.

After opening statements, jurors were taken back to their hotel for the night. They are being sequestered until they’ve reached a verdict in the case.

NOTICE: All persons depicted are presumed to be innocent unless proven to be guilty in a court of law. The fugitive.com and fugitivewatch.com notations appearing on this are TRADEMARKS and NOT an expression of fact or opinion.

AVISO: Todas las personas representadas son presumidas de ser inocente a menos que resultara culpable en un tribunal de justicia. Fugitive.com y fugitivewatch.com anotaciones que aparecen en este sitio son MARCAS REGISTRADAS y NO una expresión de hecho o de opinión.

COMMENT ADVISEMENT: We welcome your thoughts, but for the sake of all readers, please refrain from the use of obscenities, personal attacks or racial slurs. All comments are subject to our terms of service and may be removed. Repeat offenders may lose commenting privileges.

AVISO DE COMENTARIO: Damos la bienvenida a tus pensamientos, pero por el bien de todos los lectores, por favor abstenerse de la utilización de obscenidades, ataques personales o insultos racistas. Todos los comentarios están sujetos a nuestros términos y condiciones del servicio, y podrá ser retirado. Reincidentes pueden perder privilegios comentar.


Fugitive Watch was founded in 1992 by two San Francisco Bay area police officers, Steve Ferdin and Scott Castruita. Fugitive Watch is a reality-based television show, newspaper and website, fugitive.com. We can also be found on social media such as InstagramFacebook, and Twitter. The mission of Fugitive Watch is to make Your community safer by helping law enforcement fight crime. Fugitive Watch brings the community, local business, and law enforcement together to solve crimes, apprehend wanted fugitives and provide education and crime prevention information to the community.

Business and private sponsorship help Fugitive Watch empower the community to strike back at crime from the safety of their living rooms. Fugitive Watch has been credited by law enforcement with over several 1000 crimes solved or fugitives apprehended. Fugitive Watch also helps improve the safety of police officers by locating fugitives for law enforcement so they can more safely arrest them rather than unexpectedly running across them through extremely dangerous routine “chance encounters”. As law enforcement officers know all too well, These “chance encounters” have resulted in countless officer injuries and deaths.

Leave a Comment